Latest dubious developments re: Boston Bombings story

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22563155


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57584771/boston-bombings-suspect-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-left-note-in-boat-he-hid-in-sources-say/

 

A whole month after the event, we have stumbled across a note written with a marker pen onto the inside of the boat containing the long awaited ‘confession’ and ‘motive’… thus we have ‘proof’ and ‘closure’. A big relief!

Another way to look at it is this… the transparency of this manufactured evidence is reminiscent of similar findings we have been expected to swallow in the wake of other terrorist events. Using the 9/11 example… finding the hijacker’s passport in the rubble… finding his rucksack which he had left behind at the airport (containing a flight manual and a copy of the Qu’ran!)… the Pentagon moment-of-impact video which shows nothing... the mobile phone calls made from high altitude, which even the FBI have now admitted is not possible… etc.

Is it feasible that the suspect had a marker pen on him? Maybe, assuming he also had a torch and nothing was dropped in the frantic exchange of gun fire that supposedly happened.

Is it feasible that he was able to fit such a long (and incriminating) message onto one wall inside the boat? Maybe, but this message also contains details of his personal manifesto and it seems there was also room for ‘over one hundred rounds’ to be fired into the same wall while the note still remains legible.

Is it acceptable that no image of this note is being released to the public? I can’t think of a single reason not to release it, other than the fact that it will be exposed as fake evidence. A similar question which has a similar answer is why were we not allowed to see a picture of Bin Laden’s dead body before he was thrown into the sea?

Adding this latest ‘evidence’ to the rest of the illogical and contradictory reports in the media regarding these suspects, I am at a loss to understand how there can possibly be a case against them in a fair court. Meanwhile, mainstream media will continue to ignore all of the other infinitely more feasible suspects highlighted in the event photos circulating in alternative media… now totally justified since at last we have our concrete ‘proof’.

It’s a shame the suspect can’t speak in order to reject this evidence and fight his case, since he sustained a throat injury just after he was found inside the boat… Expecting more conveniently bizarre stories during the trial.


Post notes:
1) See link... http://www.infowars.com/man-linked-to-boston-bombing-suspect-confesses-to-murder-gets-shot-by-fbi/
Suspect's friend confesses to being an accomplice then gets shot because he lunged at an FBI agent with a knife... of course they had no other option but to shoot to kill... and don't pay any attention to the idea that this 3rd victim could have been a possible character witness / alibi... nor to the idea that this annexe to the main story adds more weak evidence to the non-existent evidence we already have...